108 research outputs found

    A superadditivity and submultiplicativity property for cardinalities of sumsets

    Get PDF
    For finite sets of integers A1, . . . ,An we study the cardinality of the n-fold sumset A1 + · · · + An compared to those of (n − 1)-fold sumsets A1 + · · · + Ai−1 + Ai+1 + · · · + An. We prove a superadditivity and a submultiplicativity property for these quantities. We also examine the case when the addition of elements is restricted to an addition graph between the sets

    An improved sum-product estimate for general finite fields

    Full text link
    This paper improves on a sum-product estimate obtained by Katz and Shen for subsets of a finite field whose order is not prime

    Hardness of Exact Distance Queries in Sparse Graphs Through Hub Labeling

    Full text link
    A distance labeling scheme is an assignment of bit-labels to the vertices of an undirected, unweighted graph such that the distance between any pair of vertices can be decoded solely from their labels. An important class of distance labeling schemes is that of hub labelings, where a node v∈Gv \in G stores its distance to the so-called hubs Sv⊆VS_v \subseteq V, chosen so that for any u,v∈Vu,v \in V there is w∈Su∩Svw \in S_u \cap S_v belonging to some shortest uvuv path. Notice that for most existing graph classes, the best distance labelling constructions existing use at some point a hub labeling scheme at least as a key building block. Our interest lies in hub labelings of sparse graphs, i.e., those with ∣E(G)∣=O(n)|E(G)| = O(n), for which we show a lowerbound of n2O(log⁥n)\frac{n}{2^{O(\sqrt{\log n})}} for the average size of the hubsets. Additionally, we show a hub-labeling construction for sparse graphs of average size O(nRS(n)c)O(\frac{n}{RS(n)^{c}}) for some 0<c<10 < c < 1, where RS(n)RS(n) is the so-called Ruzsa-Szemer{\'e}di function, linked to structure of induced matchings in dense graphs. This implies that further improving the lower bound on hub labeling size to n2(log⁥n)o(1)\frac{n}{2^{(\log n)^{o(1)}}} would require a breakthrough in the study of lower bounds on RS(n)RS(n), which have resisted substantial improvement in the last 70 years. For general distance labeling of sparse graphs, we show a lowerbound of 12O(log⁥n)SumIndex(n)\frac{1}{2^{O(\sqrt{\log n})}} SumIndex(n), where SumIndex(n)SumIndex(n) is the communication complexity of the Sum-Index problem over ZnZ_n. Our results suggest that the best achievable hub-label size and distance-label size in sparse graphs may be Θ(n2(log⁥n)c)\Theta(\frac{n}{2^{(\log n)^c}}) for some 0<c<10<c < 1

    Quadratic Goldreich-Levin Theorems

    Full text link
    Decomposition theorems in classical Fourier analysis enable us to express a bounded function in terms of few linear phases with large Fourier coefficients plus a part that is pseudorandom with respect to linear phases. The Goldreich-Levin algorithm can be viewed as an algorithmic analogue of such a decomposition as it gives a way to efficiently find the linear phases associated with large Fourier coefficients. In the study of "quadratic Fourier analysis", higher-degree analogues of such decompositions have been developed in which the pseudorandomness property is stronger but the structured part correspondingly weaker. For example, it has previously been shown that it is possible to express a bounded function as a sum of a few quadratic phases plus a part that is small in the U3U^3 norm, defined by Gowers for the purpose of counting arithmetic progressions of length 4. We give a polynomial time algorithm for computing such a decomposition. A key part of the algorithm is a local self-correction procedure for Reed-Muller codes of order 2 (over \F_2^n) for a function at distance 1/2−ϔ1/2-\epsilon from a codeword. Given a function f:\F_2^n \to \{-1,1\} at fractional Hamming distance 1/2−ϔ1/2-\epsilon from a quadratic phase (which is a codeword of Reed-Muller code of order 2), we give an algorithm that runs in time polynomial in nn and finds a codeword at distance at most 1/2−η1/2-\eta for η=η(Ï”)\eta = \eta(\epsilon). This is an algorithmic analogue of Samorodnitsky's result, which gave a tester for the above problem. To our knowledge, it represents the first instance of a correction procedure for any class of codes, beyond the list-decoding radius. In the process, we give algorithmic versions of results from additive combinatorics used in Samorodnitsky's proof and a refined version of the inverse theorem for the Gowers U3U^3 norm over \F_2^n

    Testing Triangle-Freeness in General Graphs

    Full text link

    Representation of finite graphs as difference graphs of S-units, I

    Get PDF
    In part I of the present paper the following problem was investigated. Let G be a finite simple graph, and S be a finite set of primes. We say that G is representable with S if it is possible to attach rational numbers to the vertices of G such that the vertices v_1,v_2 are connected by an edge if and only if the difference of the attached values is an S-unit. In part I we gave several results concerning the representability of graphs in the above sense.In the present paper we extend the results from paper I to the algebraic number field case and make some of them effective. Besides we prove some new theorems: we prove that G is infinitely representable with S if and only if it has a degenerate representation with S, and we also deal with the representability with S of the union of two graphs of which at least one is finitely representable with S.p, li { white-space: pre-wrap; }</style

    The critical window for the classical Ramsey-Tur\'an problem

    Get PDF
    The first application of Szemer\'edi's powerful regularity method was the following celebrated Ramsey-Tur\'an result proved by Szemer\'edi in 1972: any K_4-free graph on N vertices with independence number o(N) has at most (1/8 + o(1)) N^2 edges. Four years later, Bollob\'as and Erd\H{o}s gave a surprising geometric construction, utilizing the isoperimetric inequality for the high dimensional sphere, of a K_4-free graph on N vertices with independence number o(N) and (1/8 - o(1)) N^2 edges. Starting with Bollob\'as and Erd\H{o}s in 1976, several problems have been asked on estimating the minimum possible independence number in the critical window, when the number of edges is about N^2 / 8. These problems have received considerable attention and remained one of the main open problems in this area. In this paper, we give nearly best-possible bounds, solving the various open problems concerning this critical window.Comment: 34 page

    Linear forms and quadratic uniformity for functions on ZN\mathbb{Z}_N

    Full text link
    A very useful fact in additive combinatorics is that analytic expressions that can be used to count the number of structures of various kinds in subsets of Abelian groups are robust under quasirandom perturbations, and moreover that quasirandomness can often be measured by means of certain easily described norms, known as uniformity norms. However, determining which uniformity norms work for which structures turns out to be a surprisingly hard question. In [GW09a] and [GW09b, GW09c] we gave a complete answer to this question for groups of the form G=FpnG=\mathbb{F}_p^n, provided pp is not too small. In ZN\mathbb{Z}_N, substantial extra difficulties arise, of which the most important is that an "inverse theorem" even for the uniformity norm ∄.∄U3\|.\|_{U^3} requires a more sophisticated (local) formulation. When NN is prime, ZN\mathbb{Z}_N is not rich in subgroups, so one must use regular Bohr neighbourhoods instead. In this paper, we prove the first non-trivial case of the main conjecture from [GW09a].Comment: 66 page
    • 

    corecore